In a landmark enforcement action that sent shockwaves through the financial industry, TD Bank N.A. and its parent company, TD Bank US Holding Company, pleaded guilty late last year to widespread violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and money laundering regulations. This case study delves into how a failure to adapt and invest in robust AML controls transformed one of the nation’s largest banks into a magnet for illicit financial activity—and the costly consequences that followed. (Click to read the original news releases from the IRS or the news release from the U.S. Dept. of Justice.)
The Background: A “flat cost paradigm” with dire consequences
Between January 2014 and October 2023, TD Bank’s AML program suffered from long-term, pervasive, and systemic deficiencies. Internal communications revealed a troubling truth: The bank’s leadership consistently chose to prioritize growth and customer convenience over bolstering its compliance infrastructure. Adhering to a “flat cost paradigm,” TD Bank’s budget for AML initiatives was not increased year-over-year, despite rapidly expanding profits and an increasingly complex risk profile. The result was an AML program that, on paper, met minimal standards but in practice was ill-equipped to detect and prevent sophisticated money laundering schemes.
The Compliance Failures: An open invitation to criminals
The Justice Department’s investigation uncovered alarming lapses, including the following:
- Inadequate AML Program: TD Bank deliberately failed to maintain an AML compliance program that met the rigorous standards required by the BSA.
- Deficient Transaction Monitoring: The bank’s static monitoring system did not evolve to address emerging risks. Nearly 92% of total transaction volume—approximately $18.3 trillion—went unmonitored, leaving the bank vulnerable to exploitation.
- Failure to File Accurate Reports: TD Bank routinely submitted inaccurate Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs), further hampering its ability to flag suspicious activities.
- Neglected High-Risk Areas: New products and services, such as Zelle and various ACH transactions, were rolled out without ensuring they were adequately covered by updated monitoring scenarios. High-risk transactions, especially those involving check activity and international-funds flows, were particularly neglected.
Then-Attorney General Merrick B. Garland encapsulated the gravity of these failures when he stated, “By making its services convenient for criminals, TD Bank became one.” This failure wasn’t accidental—it was the outcome of a calculated decision to prioritize short-term profits over the long-term integrity of the bank’s operations.
The Schemes: How criminals exploited the system
The deficiencies in TD Bank’s AML controls turned it into an “easy target” for sophisticated money laundering networks. The investigation revealed three major schemes:
- Large Cash Deposits Through Nominee Accounts:
One network funneled over $470 million into TD Bank by depositing large sums of cash into nominee accounts. In a disturbing twist, bank employees even accepted gift cards as incentives to keep processing these transactions without raising red flags. - Shell Accounts for High-Risk Transactions:
Another money laundering network, linked to a high-risk jewelry business, moved nearly $120 million through shell accounts. The lack of robust transaction monitoring allowed these illicit funds to circulate unchecked. - International ATM Withdrawals:
In a third scheme, funds deposited in the United States were rapidly withdrawn through ATMs in Colombia. Five TD Bank employees actively conspired with money launderers by issuing unauthorized ATM cards, facilitating the laundering of approximately $39 million.
These egregious breaches not only allowed hundreds of millions of dollars to flow through TD Bank’s systems but also demonstrated how deeply embedded compliance failures can be exploited by determined criminals.
The Fallout: A historic penalty and a stark warning
TD Bank’s guilty plea marked a historic moment. The bank agreed to forfeit over $452 million and pay a criminal fine exceeding $1.4 billion—bringing the total financial penalty to nearly $1.9 billion. This resolution, reached in coordination with the Federal Reserve, OCC, FinCEN, and other regulatory bodies, stands as the largest penalty ever imposed under the Bank Secrecy Act. U.S. Attorney Philip R. Sellinger for the District of New Jersey bluntly stated, “TD Bank prioritized growth and convenience over following its legal obligations.”
In addition to the financial penalty, TD Bank is now required to implement comprehensive remedial measures, including:
- The retention of an independent compliance monitor for three years.
- An overhaul of its AML compliance program to address systemic deficiencies.
- Ongoing cooperation with federal investigations into individuals involved in the wrongdoing.
Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco warned, “Every bank compliance official in America should be reviewing today’s charges as a case study of what not to do. Because if the business case for compliance wasn’t clear before, it should be now.”
Lessons Learned: A cautionary tale for the financial industry
TD Bank’s case is a powerful reminder that effective AML compliance is not optional—it’s an essential component of a financial institution’s integrity and stability. Key takeaways include:
- Investment in Compliance is Non-Negotiable: Cutting corners to maintain short-term profitability can lead to long-term, catastrophic consequences.
- Dynamic Systems Over Static Controls: AML programs must evolve to address emerging risks, adapting to new products, services, and money laundering tactics. AML solutions with peak RegTech automate and integrate for peak efficiency and accuracy.
- Proactive Monitoring and Reporting: Robust, real-time transaction monitoring systems are critical in detecting and preventing illicit activity.
- A Culture of Compliance: The commitment to compliance must be ingrained at every level of the organization—from the boardroom to front-line employees.
Conclusion
TD Bank’s $1.9 billion penalty is more than just a financial setback; it is a stark warning to all financial institutions. The case underscores the necessity of a proactive, well-resourced AML compliance program that evolves in tandem with the rapidly changing landscape of financial crime. As regulators continue to ramp up enforcement, the message is clear: When a bank becomes a facilitator of criminal activity, there will be severe consequences.
For financial institutions, the lesson is simple yet profound: Invest in robust AML controls today, or risk facing the full force of regulatory and legal action tomorrow.
Choose RegTechONE for an outstanding single-solution platform for AML Compliance and GRC. RegTechONE offers workflow orchestration, data orchestration, and myriad Risk Mitigation tools on a single platform. And with RegTechONE, institutions can integrate their preferred tools via API connectivity. Contact us to learn more or to schedule a proof of concept.
